Quality Trumps Literary Faux Pas
Not only did they set a theme of immortality (an obvious parallel to their manifesto of nonfiction's identity) in their new issue, but Creative Nonfiction also published a short essay on death. Of all topics, in all genres, death and love seem off limits to writers; but here, as if taking a breath from the rank of anecdotes and light verse often seen in millennial literary publishing, we see an essay on something very deeply human, on a subject we all face.
Often, I think, publishers are faced with good work that remians unpublished because of its subject. And, just as we see Todd May struggle with the paradox of death, namely that "We need death to give us meaning...," publishers struggle with offering, like the philosopher, a "solution to this paradox." Often the clichés surrounding death as a topic kill the solution, or the journey to a solution. Sometimes we ask if art can even be the solution. But this isn't my point.
The philosopher persona in May's "Teaching Death" keeps death fresh for the reader, giving new light to something we all think about, whether in dread or delight.
Their Editor Talks About Robots on
The Daily Show
This has no connection to the quality of the magazine whatsoever. It is just awesome. Straight, unadulterated awesome.
